Efnisyfirlit

• Contents
• Acknowledgments
• Introduction
• Part I: Developing an argumentation-centred TQA model
• Chapter One: The present state of TQA and study objectives
• 1.1. TQA approaches
• 1.2. Investigations and definitions of translation norms
• 1.3. Present state: conclusions and issues
• 1.4. Objectives
• Chapter Two: Overview of argumentation framework and argument schema
• 2.1. Logic, argument and rhetoric
• 2.2. Features of an argumentation-centred TQA model
• 2.3. Argument schema
• Chapter Three: Rhetorical topology
• 3.1. Elements of the topology
• 3.2. Organizational relations
• 3.3. Conjunctives and other inference indicators
• 3.4. From inference indicators to propositional function
• 3.5. Types of argument
• 3.6. Figures
• 3.7. Narrative strategy
• 3.8. Argumentation parameters and TQA grid
• Chapter Four: Defining major error, testing the model, and determining the quality standard: prepara
• 4.1. Defining major error
• 4.2. Testing the model
• 4.3. Determining the translation quality standard
• Part II: Testing and refining the model and defining a quality standard
• Chapter Five: Testing the model
• 5.1. Analytical process
• 5.2. Analysis
• 5.3. Comparative summary of results
• Chapter Six: Refining the model
• 6.1. Introduction
• 6.2. Overall and field/use-specific TQA
• 6.3. Comparison of ARTRAQ and quantitative-microtextual TQA in terms of quality of information
• 6.4. Refinements
• Chapter Seven: ARTRAQ and development of a standard
• 7.1. Introduction
• 7.2. From norm to standard
• 7.3. Translation quality standard
• Conclusion
• 1. TQA model
• 2. Definition of error
• 3. Definition of translation quality standard
• Appendix One: Model assessment
• Appendix Two: Terminology
• Bibliography
• Further Reading
• Index
• A
• B
• C
• D
• E
• F
• G
• H
• I
• J
• L
• M
• N
• O
• P
• Q
• R
• S
• T
• U
• V
• W