Efnisyfirlit

• Cover Page
• Half Title Page
• Title Page
• Copyright Page
• Original Title Page
• Original Copyright Page
• On Complementation in Icelandic
• Acknowledgements
• Contents
• Introduction
• Footnotes to the Introduction
• Part I To Be or not To Be an NP An Overview of Icelandic Complement Structures
• Introduction
• Footnotes to the Introduction
• Chapter 1 Phrase Structure Evidence
• 1.0 The form of the argument
• 1.1 Intransitive, transitive and ditransitive verbs
• 1.1.1
• 1.1.2
• 1.1.3
• 1.2 Prepositional complements and particle verbs
• 1.3 Clauses in subject position
• 1.4 Strict subcategorization and selectional restrictions
• 1.4.0
• 1.4.1
• 1.4.2
• 1.5 Conclusion
• Footnotes to Chapter 1
• Chapter 2 Transformational Evidence
• 2.0 The form of the argument
• 2.1 Some frequently cited NP-rules and their discourse function
• 2.1.0
• 2.1.1 Topicalization, Left Dislocation, and Contrastive Dislocation
• 2.1.1.0
• 2.1.1.1
• 2.1.1.2
• 2.1.1.3
• 2.1.1.4
• 2.1.2 Right Dislocation and Extraposition
• 2.1.2.0
• 2.1.2.1
• 2.1.3 Clefts and Relatives
• 2.1.3.0
• 2.1.3.1
• 2.1.3.2
• 2.1.3.3
• 2.1.4 Passive
• 2.2 Matching rules
• 2.2.0
• 2.2.1 Conjunction
• 2.2.2 Gapping
• 2.3 Constraints on the position of NP clauses
• 2.3.0
• 2.3.1
• 2.3.2
• 2.3.3
• 2.3.4
• 2.3.5
• 2.4 Special constraints on infinitival clauses
• 2.4.0
• 2.4.1
• 2.4.2
• 2.4.3
• 2.4.4
• 2.4.5
• 2.5 Conclusion of Part I
• Footnotes to Chapter 2
• Part II Complement Types and Complement Rules
• Introduction
• Chapter 3 Selection of Complement Clause Types
• 3.0 Introduction
• 3.1 Background
• 3.2 A suggestion and some evidence from Icelandic
• 3.2.0
• 3.2.1
• 3.2.2
• 3.2.3
• 3.3 Conclusion
• Footnotes to Chapter 3
• Chapter 4 Extraposition
• 4.0 Introduction
• 4.1 Rule or no rule?
• 4.1.0
• 4.1.1
• 4.1.2
• 4.1.3
• 4.1.4.
• 4.2 Extraposition vs. Intraposition
• 4.2.0
• 4.2.1
• 4.2.2
• 4.2.3
• 4.2.3.1
• 4.2.3.2
• 4.2.4
• 4.2.4.0
• 4.2.4.1
• 4.2.4.2
• 4.2.4.3
• 4.2.4.4
• 4.2.5
• 4.3 What is ‘it’?
• 4.3.0
• 4.3.1
• 4.3.2
• 4.3.3
• 4.3.3.0
• 4.3.3.1
• 4.3.3.2
• 4.3.3.3
• 4.3.3.4
• 4.3.4
• 4.3.4.0
• 4.3.4.1
• 4.3.4.2
• 4.3.4.3
• 4.3.5
• 4.3.5.0
• 4.3.5.1
• 4.3.5.2
• 4.3.5.3
• 4.3.5.4
• 4.3.6
• 4.3.6.0
• 4.3.6.1
• 4.3.6.2
• 4.3.7
• 4.4 Object Extraposition
• 4.4.0
• 4.4.1 Verb classes and Object Extraposition
• 4.4.1.1
• 4.4.1.2
• 4.4.1.3
• 4.4.2 What is ‘it’?
• 4.4.2.0
• 4.4.2.1
• 4.4.2.2
• 4.4.2.3
• 4.4.2.4
• 4.4.2.5
• 4.4.3 We also need [NPS] objects
• 4.4.3.1
• 4.4.3.2
• 4.4.3.3
• 4.4.3.4
• 4.4.4 Towards an explanation and a formulation
• 4.4.4.1
• 4.4.4.2
• 4.4.4.3
• 4.4.4.4
• 4.5 Summary and residual problems
• 4.5.1
• 4.5.2
• 4.5.3
• 4.5.4
• Footnotes to Chapter 4
• Chapter 5 Equi and Infinitival Complements
• 5.0 Introduction
• 5.1 Clause or not a clause
• 5.1.0 Introductory notes
• 5.1.1 Some general considerations
• 5.1.2 Transitivity
• 5.1.3 Passive and Subject Raising
• 5.1.4 Reflexivization
• 5.1.5 Reciprocals
• 5.1.6 Agreement
• 5.1.7 Adverbial modification
• 5.1.8 Conclusion
• 5.2 The nature of the subject rule
• 5.2.0
• 5.2.1 Could Equi be a transformation?
• 5.2.2 Could the subject be non-lexical?
• 5.2.3 The like-subject constraint and idiosyncrasies
• 5.3 Conclusion
• Footnotes to Chapter 5
• Chapter 6 Subject Raising
• 6.0 Introduction
• 6.1 A clausal analysis or a VP analysis?
• 6.1.1 If not syntax then semantics
• 6.1.1.0
• 6.1.1.1 Selectional restrictions
• 6.1.1.2 Reflexives
• 6.1.1.3 Reciprocals
• 6.1.1.4 Pronominalization possibilities
• 6.1.1.5 Adverbial modification
• 6.1.2 Syntax rather than semantics
• 6.1.2.0
• 6.1.2.1 Að-marking
• 6.1.2.2 Transitivity and case marking
• 6.1.2.3 Non-nominative subjects (?)
• 6.1.2.4 Extraposition
• 6.1.2.5 Idiom chunks and dummy subjects
• 6.1.2.6 Passive
• 6.1.2.7 Agreement
• 6.1.3 Conclusion
• 6.2 Raising or tenseless S ?
• 6.2.0 Introduction
• 6.2.1 Constituenthood
• 6.2.1.0
• 6.2.1.1 Right Node Raising
• 6.2.1.2 Gapping
• 6.2.1.3 Various other constructions
• 6.2.2 Clause boundary location and grammatical relations
• 6.2.2.0
• 6.2.2.1 Case marking
• 6.2.2.2 Passive
• 6.2.2.3 Topicalization
• 6.2.2.4 Adverbial modifiers
• 6.2.3 Some psycholinguistic evidence
• 6.2.3.0
• 6.2.3.1 Method
• 6.2.3.2 Subjects and procedure
• 6.2.3.3 The boundary effect
• 6.2.3.4 Object Equi vs. ACI complements
• 6.2.3.5 Conclusion
• 6.2.4 Is there a rule of SOR?
• 6.3 Subject-to-subject raising
• 6.3.0 Introduction
• 6.3.1 Why assume SSR?
• 6.3.2 The situation in Icelandic
• 6.3.3 Some problems
• 6.3.4 Bresnan’s alternative
• 6.3.5 Pros and cons
• 6.3.5.1 Problems with Bresnan’s arguments and assumptions
• 6.3.5.2 Advantages of the empty subject analysis
• 6.3.6 Predicative complements?
• 6.3.7 Relation to passives?
• 6.3.8 Subject-to-predicative raising?
• 6.3.9 Some suggestions for further study
• 6.4 Some implications of Raising
• 6.4.1 Idiosyncrasies
• 6.4.2 Why semantic classes?
• 6.4.3 What must the raising rules do?
• 6.4.4 The general picture
• Footnotes to Chapter 6
• Part III Some Implications and Suggestions
• Introduction
• Chapter 7 Impersonal Constructions
• 7.1 Impersonal constructions without dummies
• 7.1.0
• 7.1.1
• 7.1.1.0
• 7.1.1.1
• 7.1.1.2
• 7.1.1.3
• 7.1.1.4
• 7.1.1.5
• 7.1.1.6
• 7.1.1.7
• 7.1.1.8
• 7.1.1.9
• 7.2 Impersonal constructions with dummies
• 7.2.0
• 7.2.1.
• 7.2.2
• 7.2.3
• Footnotes to Chapter 7
• Conclusion
• Appendix A
• 6.2.3.3
• 6.2.3.4
• Appendix B
• References